At E3 this past summer, AMD announced a number of new GPUs that might make up its next-generation product spouse and children: The Radeon Fury A, the Fury, your Fury Nano, as well as the as-yet-unreleased dual-GPU Fury. We’ve covered each launch therefore, but the R9 Nano (AMD opted to shorten your name) is arguably the pinnacle in the entire Fury spouse and children. While it’s not supposed to match the Radeon Fury X’s performance, it’s even shorter as opposed to Fury X’s 7. 5 inches. At just six to eight inches, the Nano is exactly the same size as some sort of PCIe x16 position. Any shorter, and AMD would’ve had to compromise on coach bandwidth.
AMD R9 Nano Review
Read More: Samsung Makes New 12Gb LPDDR4 DRAM Clocked At 4266MHz
In man or women, the card is every bit as impressive because it looks in photos. At six inches long, it’s actually shorter as opposed to first 3D accelerator My spouse and i ever bought, your Diamond Monster II. GPUs have received larger and smaller through the years, but I don’t at any time recall AMD as well as Nvidia fielding some sort of GPU this small at the high end in the product stack. This opens up all method of interesting system options for mini-ITX as well as small form issue enthusiasts, and that’s your audience that AMD really wants to target with this kind of card.
One note: We don’t currently have data to share on what the Nano performs specifically in a very mini-ITX configuration. The chassis that we ordered for your review shipped later and missed its plane. As an end result, our Coolermaster Elite 110 currently is sitting in Newark, NJ. For now, we’ve chose to review the card against both the GTX 970 Mini and its particular full-size cousins and also competitors from AMD and Nvidia in a very full-size ATX framework. AMD may possess a different market in mind for this GPU, but there’s absolutely no reason it can’t be used in a full-size framework — and users thinking about purchasing one may choose to know its performance characteristics in a variety of thermal environments.
The Nano will be the smallest high-end GPU we’ve ever tested as well as the card’s cooler and also heatsink are evidently high-class, but the cost gap between your R9 Nano and its particular closest competitor is actually nothing to sneeze on. The GTX 970 Mini is really a $355 GPU, rising against a $649 Nano. That’s a higher bar to obvious, and if you’re trying to the Nano in order to justify it strictly on performance good grounds, you’re going being disappointed. The Nano is more complicated than that, for reasons we’re likely to be discussing.
GTX 970 MiniLike your R9 Nano, the Asus GTX 970 Mini is really a small GPU on 6. 7-inches long using a double-wide PCIe position, two DVI plug-ins, HDMI, and some sort of DisplayPort. Asus clocks your card at 1088MHz starting and 1228MHz raise — a tresses above Nvidia’s share 1050MHz / 1178MHz setup.
We tested the Nano in your Core i7-5960X testbed (Haswell-E) having 16GB of DDR4-2667 and also Windows 8. 1 having all patches and also updates installed. While we mean to update to Windows 10 in the future, our previous examining was all through with Windows 8. 1, and we chose to maintain that continuity instead of upgrading mid-cycle.
We’ve made one change to your test suite and also replaced the old Metro Last Mild, which debuted with 2013, with your upgraded Metro Very last Light Redux, which shipped a year later. All individuals AMD and Nvidia cards are actually retested in the newest title, and our strength consumption figures were recalculated using the newer version in the game as effectively.
When we chose to test the R9 Nano with both a mini-ITX field and standard framework, we decided for making one additional modification towards the GPU’s default setup. Instead of departing the GPU on its default strength settings, we used Switch Control Center to express to the GPU to work with up to 50% additional power than usual. This was done as a way to measure the performance delta between Nano as well as the Fury X in a very more conventional tower in contrast to a thermally constrained mini-ITX system.
As a way to present at the very least some additional information on how Nano performs in a very standard configuration, all of us backtracked and screened the R9 Nano on its default strength level in Neighborhood Last Light Redux. While this can be just one data point at the moment, using that game allow us to make an apples-to-apples comparison with the other GPUs all of us evaluated.
AMD R9 Nano Review
We attempted to use third-party drivers to change the GTX 970’s greatest power consumption, though the Asus GTX 970 Mini doesn’t apparently support this characteristic in Asus’ very own GPU Tweak as well as MSI Afterburner. Nvidia Inspector reported that it could change your GPU to 110% regarding standard, but that utility hasn’t been updated in greater year and all of us saw no performance differences between 100% and also 110%. Either the utility not functions or your GTX 970 Mini doesn’t demand it.